Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Facundo Mena Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Jul at 11:34 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Daniel Vallejo vs F. Mena

PAR
3
Win
Played
0
Win

ARG
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Vallejo 3 - 0 Mena
They have played 7 sets in total, with Adolfo Daniel Vallejo winning 6 and Facundo Mena winning 1. The last match between Adolfo Daniel Vallejo and Facundo Mena was at the Zug Challenger, 22-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Adolfo Daniel Vallejo getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vallejo | 3 |
| Mena | 0 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) Zug Challenger(07-22-25)
(R1) Poznan Challenger(06-16-25)
(R1) Curitiba Challenger(10-22-24)
A. D. Vallejo vs F. Mena H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $72,000 | Career Prize Money | $140,110 |
| 56.83% (129-98) | Career Total W/L | 56.68% (509-389) |
| 3 | Clay | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 15 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. D. Vallejo vs F. Mena Match Preview:
- Mena has shown slightly better recent form on second serve points, winning 46.56% compared to Vallejo's 45.37%. Could this marginal edge make a difference?
- In return games, Vallejo has the upper hand, winning 45.5% of their opponent's second serve points against Mena's 41.34%.
- Mena is stronger under pressure, saving 60.45% of breakpoints compared to Vallejo's 55.56%, an important factor in close games.
- Performance over the last year shows Vallejo with a higher match win rate (51.61%) than Mena (42.55%), indicating overall stronger consistency.
- Mena's best surface is indoor hard, with a 67% win rate, while Vallejo excels on hard courts at 58%, potentially influencing surface-specific outcomes.
- Though both players compete mostly at the Challengers/ITF level, Mena has slightly thrived more often with a 45.45% win rate in these matches compared to Vallejo’s 42.86%.
- In direct head-to-head encounters, Vallejo leads significantly, having won 2 matches out of 2 against Mena, including a recent straight-sets victory.
- Vallejo's ability to perform in deciding sets, winning 48% over the last year, surpasses Mena's 37%, providing a potential edge in prolonged matches.
- Both players have nearly identical break point conversion rates, around 33.9%, suggesting equal proficiency in utilizing break opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (July 22, 2025, UTC):
As we look forward to this match-up, past encounters and recent performance trends provide a strong basis for anticipation. Vallejo’s success in previous head-to-head matches solidifies their psychological edge over Mena.
While Mena exhibits a slight advantage in second serve efficiency and break point saving, Vallejo's superior return game stats, especially on opponents' second serves, could be decisive. Furthermore, Vallejo's better record in deciding sets and overall win percentage hints at a higher level of resilience and consistency, vital in competitive settings.
Given these observations, Vallejo stands as the likely victor in this upcoming encounter with Mena.
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Facundo Mena Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. D. Vallejo vs F. Mena H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 33 | Games Won | 16 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:16:36 | Average Match Time | 1:16:36 |
| 66% (104/157) | 1st Serve % | 58% (83/144) |
| 72% (75/104) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (45/83) |
| 43% (23/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (19/61) |
| 79% (15/19) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (7/24) |
| 56% (80/144) | Return Points Win % | 38% (59/157) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. D. Vallejo Recent Matches Played
F. Mena Recent Matches Played

A. D. Vallejo vs F. Mena Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.83% (129/98) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.68% (509/389) |
| 55.28% (288/233) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.04% (1125/919) |
| 52.24% (2493/2279) | Games Win/Loss | 51.49% (9791/9223) |
| 56.36% (31/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.49% (74/57) |
| 57.49% (96/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.73% (430/328) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 325 | Aces Total | 2682 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 675 | Total Double Faults | 1523 |
| 1:39:9 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 380.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 515.42 |
| 62% (8645/14023) | 1st Serve % | 55% (21018/38469) |
| 63% (5453/8645) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (14776/21018) |
| 49% (2650/5377) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8791/17451) |
| 45% (738/1625) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1744/4056) |
| 43% (6047/14019) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16049/39465) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 25.00% (4/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 26.32% (5/14) |
| 48.36% (59/63) | Challenger W/L | 51.25% (185/176) |
| 68.04% (66/31) | Futures W/L | 63.00% (315/185) |
| 57% (127/223) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (505/890) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 38% (18/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (154/269) |
| 56% (36/64) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (145/254) |
| 87% (126/109) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (484/423) |
| 13% (126/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (484/60) |
| 20% (101/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (414/86) |